#Naturalisation Application

[lexlawuk]

Update: Proving Your English Language Abilities for UK Visa Applications

When applying for a UK visa or citizenship, demonstrating your proficiency in English is often a critical requirement. This is typically done by passing a Secure English Language Test (SELT). This detailed guide will explain the different types of tests, the immigration routes that require them, and the importance of choosing a reputable London law firm, like ours, to assist with your visa…

[shiva1906]

Steps to British Citizenship: A Guide to British Naturalisation

Discover the essentials of the British naturalisation process with our step-by-step guide. From understanding eligibility requirements to preparing your British naturalisation application, we cover each detail to make the journey toward UK citizenship easier. Learn about the residency criteria, language requirements, Life in the UK test, and important documents you'll need. Take the first steps toward British citizenship confidently and understand the privileges and responsibilities it brings.

[coatessolicitors]

Court Rules Only Ground To Challenge Naturalisation Refusals Is Irrationality

Justice Mostyn ruled that challenges to the Home Secretary’s decision to refuse citizenship naturalisation applications can only be brought on grounds of irrationality.

[onelawchamber]

The Ultimate Guide on How to Become a British Citizen

In order to be eligible to apply for British citizenship, you will need to meet certain eligibility requirements. Some of these criteria include having lived in the UK for a certain length of time, having an approved visa, and having a good knowledge of language and life in the UK.

[transmutationisms]

You’ve introduced me to so many topics in theory but there are days when I have no idea what you’re talking about and i twirl my hair and kick my feet while I’m lying on my bed and giggle like omg tell me more

hi megan <3 this is fair also sometimes i am truly talking out my ass and making zero effort to make a thought comprehensible to anyone else lol but i remember you've read some of the 'speculative materialists' so you would probably get a kick out of this:

basically i was mostly just drafting a paragraph explaining how the french 'idéologues' in the 1790s-1810s conceived of sense perception and access to external phenomena, and i used kant as a compare/contrast because he's an easy reference point on this topic/time period:

Idéologie itself was never a singular scientific method, but described a loose methodological family (often referred to by ‘Idéologues,’ such as Cabanis, as analysis) that aimed to uncover the deeper truths and universal laws that structured phenomenal observations. It was this quality that led the historian of medicine George Rosen to describe idéologie as a meeting point of empiricism and the “passive psychology” of Étienne Bonnot de Condillac (1714–1780). For Condillac and his followers, including Cabanis, all ideas of the human mind had their origin in sensations—that is, in the impressions made by external objects upon the sensory organs. Thus, an idea could always be broken down to its component sensations, which could be traced back to their external sources. There were no human ideas or mental faculties that did not ultimately take their source from sensory impressions; human understanding could be studied, corrected, and eventually refashioned by careful application of the ‘analytical’ method. Whereas Kant, whose first Critique was published in 1781, defended a distinction between a priori and a posteriori judgments, the Idéologues considered even an inherited tendency or instinct to be ultimately and strictly a product of sensation. If Kantian transcendental idealism dictated that human observation could never directly access the external phenomena in-themselves, idéologie instead embraced the naïve realist position that the external objects could truly be known and described—but only by precise analysis of their noumenal representations.

and then i was like well condillac died in 1780 and cabanis's most famous treatise was published in 1802 so basically the timing lines up really well for this comparison to kant, and what you would need to do is derive these different attitudes toward things-in-themselves from the political-economic contexts that they're embedded in & patterned on. which would be extremely easy to do on the french side because cabanis was 1) a politician and 2) explicitly openly concerned about the health of the workforce as a means of ensuring the continued production of french national wealth, such that my argument about him is essentially that we should be reading him as espousing proto eugenic positions and as verbalising much of the biopolitical remit of the revolutionary and postrevolutionary french state. like essentially, analogous to the way that c. darwin 'found' capitalist competition in nature, you would say something like, cabanis 'found' (naturalised) the need for management and alteration of the labourer's body & physiology in his medico-philosophical treatises.

anyway i would need to brush up on kant biography stuff but given his interest in physical anthropology and specifically his racial essentialism, it would be easy also to argue that his 'correlationist' thinking derived from how he patterned psychology on a teleological racial-hierarchical view of human biology. which is in turn ofc an economic and political argument. so what i would want to prove here is that both these positions, while seemingly disparate, are ultimately just different bourgeois ideologies & follow superstructurally from the material alienation of capitalist labour relations etc etc. i would do this more elegantly and thoroughly in an actual article but this is tumblr.dashboard :-)

[beardedmrbean]

Swedish border guards will be given the power to search migrants’ smartphones to look for evidence of destroyed passports under a new law backed by the country’s Right-wing coalition government.

The law comes as part of a wider push to speed up deportations of failed asylum seekers to drive down migrant numbers amid fears they are being recruited by Sweden’s organised crime gangs.

Officials believe migrants entering Sweden may have used their phones to take photos or make digital copies of their passports and other documents before destroying them on arrival at airports.

Swedish officials said identifying migrants was vital if the person was to be deported after a failed claim.

‘They might keep a copy’ 

“Next week, we are going to receive a government inquiry on increasing the possibilities for the police to look into iPhones to find the documents that have been scanned there,” Anders Hall, state secretary for the ministry of justice, told The Telegraph.

“When you tear up your passport, you might keep a copy or a photo in your phone because sooner or later you might need it. This will give the legal basis to make it possible to look for them.”

The government expects the law to enter into force in 2025-26 after a consultation period.

Sweden now says there are more emigrants than immigrants for the first time in 50 years after toughening asylum rules since Ulf Kristersson took power as prime minister in 2022.

His conservative coalition is propped up by the hard-Right Sweden Democrats, which was partly founded by Nazi sympathisers and remains formally outside of government despite coming second in a 2022 election dominated by fears over migration and crime.

“We signed up for a very detailed agreement, both in terms of law enforcement and migration,” Mr Hall said.

“The Sweden Democrats have more or less full insight into what we are doing. We are constantly having meetings with them, telling them where we are implementing.”

He pointed out that despite the uproar over the cooperation with the Sweden Democrats, the opposition Social Democrats had not voted against a single migration measure brought forward by the government.

“There was much ado about nothing,” he said before adding that the Sweden Democrats were being encouraged to be more responsible through their brushes with government.

Mr Hall was in London this week to brief UK government officials on Sweden’s crackdown.

Other measures include boosting voluntary repatriation, as well as deportations.

Naturalised citizens and families of migrants could be offered money to leave the country as part of a voluntary return scheme that already offers refugees about £720 and travel costs.

As a rule, asylum seekers should live in reception centres or return centres rather than private housing. 

The government has also introduced rules making it possible to strip serious criminals or terrorists with dual nationalities of their Swedish nationality.

Accepted refugees are also no longer granted permanent residence as a matter of course. Instead, their claim is reviewed every three years.

Sweden is among EU member states calling for tougher rules to make deporting failed asylum seekers easier.

Increasing numbers of claims are being made by migrants arriving in the bloc legally in airports before destroying their papers.

In 2015, 13 per cent of all asylum claims in the EU were made in Sweden but that was down to 2 per cent in 2023. In 2023, Sweden received 12,600 asylum applications, which is lower than in 2020, and is expected to be the lowest since 1997.

[kivaember]

you know what it's time for some freud

-

"-scored passably on the simulations. Combined with their positive employee appraisal reports, I think that Castor Jones should be accepted as the Vesper's deputy assault pilot."

Freud eyed the projector screen doubtfully, his hands idly twisting the Rubix cube in his hands. It clck-clck-clck'd obnoxiously loud, but no one in the meeting - himself, Snail or their 'supervisor' (a high-ranking executive that did nothing but collect a paycheck) - complained about it, although he could see Snail's cheek had developed some kind of spastic twitch in the last five minutes.

"Castor Jones excelled over the majority, but he's not suitable as a deputy assault pilot," Snail drawled, somehow managing to hit the sweet spot of sounding respectful while also silently implying 'you fucking donkey'. "He floundered during the more fast-paced scenarios."

"He's the fourth son of one of the board directors," the nameless suit countered. Freud looked away from the projector screen, already knowing Snail was going to win the argument. "He's young and wants to spend a year or two in an official AC squad before settling in his role as department head of Schneider R&D. We can tolerate him for that long. In exchange, his father's promised to vouch for us when it comes to the budget reallocation this coming spring."

"In case you've forgotten, Arquebus leadership have declared their intent for a Rubicon expedition in the near future. I'm not willing to bring an untested, unblooded pilot into that mess when their death would mean my censure - and yours, as the one vouching for them."

One-hit KO. The nameless suit made an awkward, stammering noise, before conceding the point.

"Alright, that's a fair point... then we can discard the applicants with... inconvenient links, then."

Freud finished solving the cube by the time the suit finished discarding said applicants. He tossed the plastic toy onto the table, where it clattered loudly, skidding across the polished surface to stop near Snail's elbow. His second-in-command ignored it.

"We're left with three..." the suit sighed. "All of them are naturalised citizens. One from Mars, one from the Kuiper belt space colony, and one from... Ganymede. Sort of."

Snail started to talk, but Freud's interest was snagged. "Sort of?"

"Er." The suit jolted. Freud rarely spoke to him, after all. "Yes. Well. In truth, his backstory is a little inconsistent, but his naturalisation process was due to being sponsored by a high-ranking executive in Schneider. Unfortunately, we can't really question them on it, as that executive died a few months ago. A bad bout of food poisoning from ill-prepared pufferfish..."

Convenient, Freud thought. His gaze drifted to the projector screen when the suit obligingly brought up the applicant's profile.

A mugshot of a handsome young man was shown, with a face that was set neutrally, though Freud could see echoes of a frown wanting to settle on the hard line of his mouth. Yet the most remarkable thing in the photo were his eyes: they were an eerie and unnatural shade of vivid scarlet.

"His parents were Rubiconians," the suit said. "That's why his eyes are like that. Something about the trace Coral in their bodies... I don't really get the science behind it. He's not an Old Gen."

"Is he augmented?" Snail drawled. "We won't accept him if he's below Gen Seven."

"Gen Eight. His augmentation certificates passed muster, though they were likely done on the black market."

"Hm." Snail didn't seem bothered about this. "Then he has no corporate debt hanging over him, though he may be indebted to whoever did his augmentations..."

"No debts. His financial records show no out-going payments that flag as suspicious. It's likely he paid upfront to whoever did them."

"Freud?" Snail asked.

"He was the one who used the Nachtreiher frame in the simulations, wasn't he?" Freud remarked, skimming the rest of the information on the profile. Age and birthplace, he didn't care about - the simulation results, yes. He had watched a few, and the Nachtreiher pilot had stood out. The one called- "STEEL HAZE, right? He was decent."

"That's right. He's a tester AC pilot for Schneider, so used one of their frames for the application. He's currently part of the Lammergeier project..."

"You said before that his backstory was inconsistent," Snail interrupted. "What's the assessment on that?"

"It's possible he's an agent of some kind, but he hasn't exfiltrated any sensitive information from what we can tell," the suit said. "I ran it by O'Keeffe even, but he didn't find anything alarming. Says his family were involved in black market shenanigans in Tau Ceti, and that's what he's trying to conceal. Nothing too dangerous..."

No, that wasn't anything to be concerned about. A lot of people had links to Tau Ceti - in fact, majority of naturalised citizens outside of the solar system came from Tau Ceti. The black market planet held a very important place in the galactic ecosystem. So long as this applicant wasn't selling corporate secrets or information back to his mates on Tau Ceti, then he really did have nothing to worry about. Still, they'll let him think he was keeping that secret. People with things to hide tend to be less willing to put a toe out of line.

"I want to fight him," Freud decided.

Snail made a low, cut-off noise that all but oozed exasperation. "He's beneath you, Freud."

"If he's to be my deputy assault pilot, then I want an accurate measure of his skill," Freud argued. He pointed at the suit. "Arrange a time with him. I'll put him through his paces. If he passes muster, he's in."

"But- I mean- there're two others-"

"I don't care about them. I want-" he paused to glance at the name. "-Rusty? That's a dog's name, goddamn."

"Freud..." Snail looked like he was going to argue, but predictably he simply gave in. This was why Snail lasted as his second-in-command for so long: he was a quick learner in knowing when to stand his ground, and when to concede. "Fine. I suppose he is going to be your problem most of the time."

"What're you saying, Snail? He's going to be our problem."

"Erm." The suit coughed awkwardly. "I... well, I suppose I'll arrange a time later this week?"

"Yeah. Put it in my calendar and Snail will tell me," Freud said dismissively.

Snail's eyebrow twitched. "I'm not your secretary-"

"Yes you are."

The suit was looking increasingly uncomfortable as Snail pinned Freud down with a glare that threatened to flay the skin off his bones. Freud smiled prettily at him, mentally goading him: do it, come on, i know you want to punch me-

"...right. Meeting adjourned," Snail said, looking away from him, his cold, dismissive mask sliding into place. "We'll revisit this subject after Freud has finished mauling this hapless applicant to pieces."

Freud clicked his tongue but kept up the smile. His mood was buoyed. He was going to fight this mysterious applicant who had piloted that Nachtreiher like a dream... made sense if he was on the Lammergeier project... no armour on that Core... his evasion skills must be impressive. Well, Freud will find out.

"Right. Well, I'll send rejection notices to the ones we've decided were too inconvenient...?"

Freud stood up as Snail and the suit hashed out boring office bullshit, snatching up his cube and ambling out of the meeting room with a jaunty whistle.

Time to pester O'Keeffe about this 'Rusty'. That guy never stuck his neck out for anyone, so it'd be interesting to see what links he had with this random nobody from Ganymede...

[junawer]

By Hebh Jamal. Nov 9, 2023

It is no secret Germany has taken a vehement pro-Israel stance with unconditional support for their genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza. However, their weaponization of antisemitism against migrant communities has presented itself as vehemently authoritarian, anti-democratic, and just plain racist.

So here’s a list just so you know. Each bullet point can have its own dissertation written on it.

Ban the pro-Palestinian organization Samidoun in Germany

Ban pro- Palestinian or anti-Israel protests across the country, leading to many instances of police violence, brutality and racial profiling

Ban keffiyehs, colors of the Palestinian flag, or stickers that say “Free Palestine” in Berlin primary and secondary schools. If violated, the teacher holds the right to call the police.

CDU Leader, Freidrich Merz says: “If there are refugees from Gaza then these are initially an issue for the neighboring countries. Germany cannot absorb any more refugees. We have enough antisemitic young men in the country.”

German President Steinmeier calls for Arab communities to condemn antisemitism

FDP Vice President Kubicki calls for an upper limit for migrants in city districts

“A quarter of the city must not have more than 25 percent migrants, so that no parallel societies emerge. What we see on German streets today is the result of parallel societies that developed because people came together in certain neighborhoods.”

“we can already legally deport people to third countries that are willing to accept them, and i would recommend that the federal government not only talk to countries of origin, but also to African countries, for example of which we know that theyd be willing to take people for a small fee. And we could do that today.”

Olaf Scholz vowing to “deport people on a large scale”

Then he does it. German government passed a “historic cross party deal” to clamp down on immigration and will “explore setting up asylum processing centres outside the EU”

it will open migrant centres in Albania

scales back social benefits for refugees, increases federal financial support for state governments and sets ambitious targets to speed up deportations

CDU General Secretary Carsten Linnemann says Scholz’s plan is not enough

“Asylum seekers should only be distributed among the municipalities if there is a right to remain. In addition, family reunification should be restricted and asylum procedures should be carried out in third countries.”

CDU General Linnemann calls for migrant quotas in schools

“35 percent - in the opinion of CDU General Secretary Linnemann, there should not be more migrants in German schools. He can also imagine a quota for residential areas.”

Linnemann advocated the introduction of compulsory preschool education followed by a language test . “I would only enroll young people who really know the German language.”

“Liberal” politician calls for stripping of German citizenship for people who he believes is “antisemitic.” He also urges that an antisemitism test be present in German naturalisation applications.

Give Israel an extra 300 million euros to continue their genocide of Palestinians

ARD tells its journalists how to talk about dead Palestinians - you guessed it, only in the context of its Hamas’ fault.

Berlin Senate is trying to strip funding from a cultural center in Berlin, Oyoun, because it gave space to anti-Zionist Jews.

I can go on and on and on, but it seems gravely more clear that Germany is utilizing the war on Gaza to carry out their right wing authoritarian fantasies. We can see and expect more to come.

[xxxjarchiexxx]

Germany’s Bundestag will discuss, on Friday, two draft laws that propose imposing harsher penalties for alleged anti-Semitic expression and making citizenship conditional on recognising Israel’s right to exist and steering clear of criticising the Occupation State. According to a document published on the German Bundestag’s website, the federal parliament will “discuss for the first time two draft laws submitted by the CDU/CSU parliamentary group” on changing the criminal code on “combatting anti-Semitism, terror, hatred and incitement” and ending “the residence and preventing the naturalisation of anti-Semitic foreigners”. The first bill is reportedly a reaction to the operation carried out by Palestinian Resistance group, Hamas, in Israeli-held territory on 7 October, which the Bundestag says “exacerbates the threat level for Jewish citizens in Germany as well. It is intolerable and unacceptable that Hamas terrorism and anti-Semitism are cheered and propagated, that Israel’s right to exist is publicly denied at demonstrations and that the destruction of the State of Israel is called for.” The governmental body also reiterated Germany’s belief that “the protection of Jewish life is a state responsibility and non-negotiable. Jews should be able to feel safe in Germany. Furthermore, such acts damaged community cohesion and threatened the stability of society as a whole. The state is therefore particularly called upon to act here”. The draft will also ensure that “the protection gaps in the event of a breach of the peace are to be closed and the current penalty range is to be increased and the criminal liability of … appealing for sympathy is to be restored”. It further stated that there should be an increase in “the range of penalties for sedition”, which it defined as “punishment for denying the right to exist of the State of Israel and for calling for the abolition of the State of Israel”. Regarding the second bill, the draft advocates that changes should be made to Germany’s residence, asylum and nationality law in order to “provide better protection against the further entrenchment and spread of anti-Semitism that has ‘immigrated’ from abroad”. The parliamentary group reportedly aims to introduce into the country’s residence law the requirement that not only will an anti-Semitic crime result in expulsion of the alleged perpetrator, but also results in a conviction leading to “a prison sentence of at least six months and to the denial or loss of humanitarian protection in Germany”. Under that second draft bill, the acquisition of German citizenship by refugees, asylum seekers or migrants will “be dependent on a commitment to Israel’s right to exist and a declaration that the naturalisation applicant has not pursued or pursued any endeavours directed against the existence of the State of Israel.” As a consequence, if there are “actual, unshakable indications of an anti-Semitic attitude on the part of the applicant”, according to the bill’s goal, “naturalisation according to their will should be expressly excluded.” There would also reportedly be a new offence introduced into nationality law in which “people with at least one other nationality lose their German nationality if they are convicted of an anti-Semitic crime and given a prison sentence of at least one year.”

16 November 2023

[virmire]

wait sorry if this is too personal but how does that work? if you were born and raised in denmark how are you not a citizen?

no worries! denmark doesn’t have naturalisation by law which means that the only two ways of getting citizenship nowadays is by

a) having one parent who has danish citizenship

or b) fulfilling requirements such as having lived in the country for nine consecutive years (eight of those being legal) and you need to have been in full time employment or run your own business for 3 1/2 years out of 4 years. having a criminal record is not allowed. the only way to avoid the full time job requirement is if you’ve studied uninterrupted (so no sabbaticals). you must have had permanent residency for 2 years I think it is before you can apply for citizenship. you can’t be in debt. there are some other things too I think. but once you meet those requirements, THEN you can apply to take two tests (one if you’ve already been through the danish school system) which I don’t remember how much cost. the main one consists of 45 questions where you need to answer 36 correctly. if you pass those, THEN you can apply to become a citizen which costs 4000 DKK. the processing for that application takes over a year and if that gets approved, it’s then added to this law thingy that gets taken up in government and once that is done you have to meet up for a ceremony where you have to shake the official’s hand.

so while I do fulfil most of the requirements to apply for citizenship, I don’t fulfil the full time employment/interrupted studying part.

tl;dr: in order to get danish citizenship either have a danish parent or fulfil a bunch of requirements plus take a test and pay some money to become one

[lexlawuk]

Unlocking the Path to British Citizenship: A Comprehensive Guide to Naturalisation

Becoming a British citizen is a significant milestone that opens doors to various privileges, including the ability to vote, work, and live in the UK without immigration controls. This article aims to provide a detailed overview of the naturalisation process, requirements, and key considerations for individuals seeking British citizenship. Understanding the Naturalisation Process Eligibility…

[chterzidislaw]

Providing legal assistance to refugees and immigrants (Migration Law)

⚖️ Christos M. Terzidis, Greek lawyer, holding a PhD title from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, is greatly experienced in Refugee/Immigration Law.

💼 As a greek law office,we undertake:

✔️Refugee and immigrant residence permits (issuance and renewal) ✔️Application for political asylum and support at all stages of the process

✔️Appeals

✔️protection from deportation

✔️protection from administrative detention

✔️deposition applications and their presentation and support before the Administrative Courts

✔️pleadings

✔️presentation and representation before the Appeals Authority and its competent committees

✔️passports (issuance-renewal)

✔️family reunifications

✔️naturalization-acquisition of Greek citizenship and support at all stages of the process

✔️Golden Visa cases , etc.

✍ We prepare each case methodically with the outmost care and attention. 💼 We serve by appointment, while there is a 24-hour service available for emergency cases. 📞 Contact us today and schedule your appointment, so that we can help you resolve your legal issues.

[maykop1010]

Since you decided to delete my comment here are the pillars of apartheid

The first pillar demarcates people into different groups – Jews and non-Jews. This is done through the Law of Return of 1950 (the same year that South Africa passed the Population Registration Act, for the same purpose). It defines who is a Jew and grants Jews all over the world the right to immigrate to Israel (or the OPT). In the occupied territories, unlike apartheid South Africa which transferred the citizenship of ’Africans’ to new fictitious political entities, Palestinians are deprived of any status.

The ‘Basic Law: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People’ declares Israel to be a ‘Jewish state’ – despite more than 20 percent of its population not being Jewish. It also entrenches the idea, contrary to the understanding of all democracies, that there is a difference between citizenship and nationality. We cannot imagine a situation in which South Africa would have declared that White people from around the world had nationality in South Africa, while Black people (including those classified ‘Coloured’ and “Indian”) could be citizens but not nationals.

DISCRIMINATION IN EVERYDAY LIFE

In Israel, the discrimination includes a denial of full-welfare benefits, restrictions on what might be taught and learnt in schools, restriction on certain types of jobs being held by Palestinians. The 2003 Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law banning Palestinian family unification is another example of discriminatory legislation. In the OPT, Palestinians are denied the right to leave and return to their country, freedom of movement and residence, and access to land. This also applies to Palestinians of East Jerusalem, who have a separate status. The disparity in the treatment of the two groups is highlighted through the application of harsher laws and different courts for OPT Palestinians than for Jewish settlers, and through restrictions imposed by the permit and ID systems. The discrimination is also illustrated by the access to water in the OPT for Palestinians and Jewish settlers, with settlers being allocated the bulk of West Bank water, at a fraction of the price that Palestinians are charged.

The second pillar, in Israel, is bolstered by the Absentee Property Law, which ensured land theft on a grand scale. Today, land in Israel is divided into national lands – 93 percent of the land, and private lands – seven percent. National lands are comprised of state lands and JNF (Jewish National Fund) lands, and are for the exclusive use of Jews. Palestinians may only own land in the private land category. So, 20 percent of the population may only use seven percent of the land – and in that too, they compete with Jews for access.

And while Israel does not have a law similar to the South African Group Areas Act which forced different “racial” groups to live in their own areas, a number of Israeli court judgments have had the same effect, by preventing Palestinian families living in Jewish areas. Since there is no civil marriage in Israel (all marriages are religious), it is impossible for a Jew to marry a non-Jew. Israel’s Citizenship and Entry into Israel Law even prevent the spouses of its Palestinian citizens from being naturalised, forcing many Palestinian families to leave.

FRAGMENTATION OF THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES

The second pillar in the OPT is reflected by Israel having fragmented the OPT for the purposes of segregation and domination. It includes Israel’s extensive theft of Palestinian land in various ways – including through the Apartheid Wall, thus shrinking the space available to Palestinians and forcing them into specific geographic fragments; the hermetic closure and isolation of Gaza; the severing of East Jerusalem from the rest of the West Bank; and appropriation and construction policies that have created a settlement infrastructure that carved up the West Bank into a network of connected settlements for Jewish-Israelis and besieged, non-contiguous Palestinian enclaves.

Israeli Jews are prohibited from entering those bantustans (as Whites were forbidden from entering African townships in South Africa), but enjoy freedom of movement throughout the rest of the Palestinian territory. South Africans find the idea of separate roads quite shocking; we never had roads for exclusive White use, and where blacks were excluded by force.

The third pillar on which Israel’s apartheid rests is its repressive “security” laws and machinery which bear little resemblance to South Africa. Sure, the extrajudicial killing (including on foreign territory), torture, administrative detention, etc. are similar to what we faced in South Africa. These policies are state-sanctioned, often approved by the Israeli judiciary, and supported by oppressive military laws and military courts. “Security” is effectively used to justify restrictions on Palestinian freedom of opinion, expression, assembly, association, and movement, and to suppress dissent and to control Palestinians. However, the deployment of Israel’s repressive machinery in the OPT is quite unfamiliar to South Africans. We never experienced, even in the worst days of apartheid, helicopter gunships and fighter jets flying over, or tanks patrolling, Black residential areas, bombing our homes and firing shells and missiles into our schools.

Hmm…

[wavevisa001]

Germany Aims to Issue 40,000 Citizenship Applications in 2025 – Apply Now!

Table of Contents:

Introduction to Germany's Citizenship Goals for 2025

Key Highlights of Germany’s Citizenship Plan

Minimum Salary Requirement for Finland Residence Permit 2025

German Citizenship Trends for 2024-2025

The Impact of the New Citizenship Law (June 2024)

How Wave Visas Can Assist in Citizenship and Residence Permit Applications

Conclusion

Germany’s Citizenship Goals for 2025Germany is setting ambitious goals to grant citizenship to 40,000 applicants in 2025. The Head of the Naturalisation Department aims to process 3,000 applications monthly to meet this target. This initiative aligns with Germany's broader efforts to streamline its immigration and citizenship processes, creating opportunities for eligible foreign workers and residents.

Key Highlights of Germany’s Citizenship Plan

Germany plans to naturalize 40,000 citizens in 2025 by processing 3,000 applications per month.

Berlin alone welcomed 21,000 naturalized citizens in 2024, showcasing its dedication to integration.

The introduction of the New Citizenship Law in June 2024 has reduced the waiting period for applicants.

Applicants may now retain their original nationality under specific conditions.

Minimum Salary Requirement for Finland Residence Permit 2025In parallel, Finland has updated its residence permit requirements:

The minimum monthly salary for residence permit eligibility is set at €1,600 starting January 1, 2025.

This salary threshold applies to primary employment of foreign skilled workers from third countries.

This change emphasizes Finland’s commitment to attracting skilled workers while maintaining a balanced economic structure.

German Citizenship Trends for 2024-2025

Germany’s capital, Berlin, played a pivotal role by naturalizing 21,000 citizens in 2024.

The Department of State Office for Immigration (LEA) has allocated 40 additional employees to speed up citizenship applications.

These measures aim to meet the growing demand for naturalizations and align with Germany’s focus on retaining skilled foreign talent.

The Impact of the New Citizenship LawThe New Citizenship Law introduced in June 2024 has made acquiring German citizenship more accessible:

Applicants benefit from shortened processing times.

The law allows individuals to retain their original nationality, fostering inclusivity and diversity.

Reports indicate that 6,000 naturalization applications were received in the latter half of 2024 alone, showcasing the law’s impact.

How Wave Visas Can Assist YouWave Visas Immigration Consulting specializes in guiding applicants through complex immigration processes, including:

German citizenship applications under the New Citizenship Law.

Finnish residence permits adhering to the updated salary requirements.

Comprehensive support for document preparation and application submission.

Our team ensures your immigration journey is seamless and compliant with the latest regulations.

ConclusionGermany’s focus on streamlining citizenship processes and Finland’s updated residence permit requirements reflect their efforts to attract and integrate skilled workers. With the right guidance from Wave Visas, you can navigate these opportunities successfully and secure a brighter future in Europe.

Contact Wave Visas today and make your dream of European migration a reality!

[actu-juridique]

France, Conseil d'État, 2ème chambre, 26 novembre 2024, 492204

https://justifiable.fr/?p=1668 https://justifiable.fr/?p=1668 #2ème #chambre #Conseil #dÉtat #France #novembre Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire, enregistrés les 26 février et 30 avril 2024 au secrétariat du contentieux du Conseil d’Etat, M. D… A… demande au Conseil d’Etat d’annuler pour excès de pouvoir le décret du 22 décembre 2023 rapportant le décret du 5 décembre 2019 lui accordant la nationalité française. Vu les autres pièces du dossier ; Vu : – le code civil ; – le code de justice administrative ; r> Après avoir entendu en séance publique : – le rapport de M. Alexandre Trémolière, maître des… Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire, enregistrés les 26 février et 30 avril 2024 au secrétariat du contentieux du Conseil d’Etat, M. D… A… demande au Conseil d’Etat d’annuler pour excès de pouvoir le décret du 22 décembre 2023 rapportant le décret du 5 décembre 2019 lui accordant la nationalité française. Vu les autres pièces du dossier ; Vu : – le code civil ; – le code de justice administrative ; Après avoir entendu en séance publique : – le rapport de M. Alexandre Trémolière, maître des requêtes en service extraordinaire, – les conclusions de M. Clément Malverti, rapporteur public ; Considérant ce qui suit : 1. Aux termes de l’article 27-2 du code civil, dans leur rédaction applicable au présent litige :  » Les décrets portant acquisition, naturalisation ou réintégration peuvent être rapportés sur avis conforme du Conseil d’Etat dans le délai de deux ans à compter de leur publication au Journal officiel si le requérant ne satisfait pas aux conditions légales ; si la décision a été obtenue par mensonge ou fraude, ces décrets peuvent être rapportés dans le délai de deux ans à partir de la découverte de la fraude. « . 2. M. A…, ressortissant marocain, a déposé une demande de naturalisation, le 22 février 2018, par laquelle il a indiqué être célibataire et s’est engagé sur l’honneur à signaler tout changement dans sa situation personnelle et familiale. Au vu de ses déclarations, il a été naturalisé par décret du 5 décembre 2019, publié au Journal officiel de la République française du 7 décembre 2019. Toutefois, par bordereau reçu le 7 janvier 2022, le ministre de l’Europe et des affaires étrangères a informé le ministre chargé des naturalisations que M. A… s’était marié le 7 aout 2019 à Al Hoceima (Maroc) avec Mme B… C…, ressortissante marocaine résidant habituellement dans son pays d’origine. Par décret du 22 décembre 2023, publié au Journal officiel du 24 décembre 2023, la Première ministre a rapporté le décret du 5 décembre 2019 prononçant la naturalisation de M. A… au motif qu’il avait été pris sur la base d’informations mensongères délivrées par l’intéressé quant à sa situation familiale. M. A… demande l’annulation pour excès de pouvoir de ce décret. 3. Aux termes de l’article 21-16 du code civil dispose que :  » Nul ne peut être naturalisé s’il n’a en France sa résidence au moment de la signature du décret de naturalisation « . Il résulte de ces dispositions que la demande de naturalisation n’est pas recevable lorsque l’intéressé n’a pas fixé en France de manière durable le centre de ses intérêts. Pour apprécier si cette condition est remplie, l’autorité administrative prend notamment en compte, sous le contrôle du juge de l’excès de pouvoir, la situation personnelle et familiale en France de l’intéressé à la date du décret lui accordant la nationalité française. 4. Il ressort des pièces du dossier que M. A… s’est uni avec Mme C…, ressortissante marocaine résidant habituellement au Maroc, le 7 aout 2019 à Al Hoceima (Maroc). Cette union aurait dû être portée à la connaissance des services instruisant sa demande de naturalisation, comme l’intéressé s’y était engagé lors du dépôt de sa demande. M. A… soutient que la fraude ne peut être caractérisée en l’absence d’intention frauduleuse. Toutefois, l’intéressé, dont la maîtrise de la langue française est notamment attestée par le compte-rendu d’assimilation du 11 février 2019 ne pouvait se méprendre ni sur la teneur des indications devant être portées à la connaissance de l’administration chargée d’instruire sa demande, ni sur la portée de la déclaration sur l’honneur qu’il a signée. Dans ces conditions, M. A… doit être regardé comme ayant volontairement dissimulé sa situation familiale. Par suite, en rapportant sa naturalisation, dans le délai de deux ans à compter de la découverte de la fraude, la Première ministre n’a pas fait une inexacte application des dispositions de l’article 27-2 du code civil. 5. Il résulte de ce qui précède que M. A… n’est pas fondé à demander l’annulation pour excès de pouvoir du décret du 22 décembre 2023 par lequel la Première ministre a rapporté le décret du 5 décembre 2019. D E C I D E : ————– Article 1er : La requête de M. A… est rejetée. Article 2 : La présente décision sera notifiée à M. D… A… et au ministre de l’intérieur. Source link JUSTIFIABLE : Indexation des Jurisprudences depuis le 1er novembre 2024 JUSTIFIABLE enrichit son offre en indexant désormais les différentes jurisprudences publiées depuis le 1er novembre 2024. Cette nouvelle fonctionnalité couvre les décisions rendues par les juridictions françaises, offrant un accès rapide et structuré à une base de données constamment mise à jour. Ce service vise à faciliter la recherche juridique et à garantir aux professionnels du droit, étudiants, et particuliers un accès clair et précis à l’évolution des décisions judiciaires en France. Explorez dès maintenant cette catégorie et restez informés des derniers développements juridiques.